NVQ Level 6 Health and Safety Unit 7: Reactive Monitoring Systems and Assessment Guide
Unit 7 of the NVQ Level 6 Occupational Health and Safety Diploma focuses on developing, implementing and maintaining reactive monitoring systems within an organisation.
Reactive monitoring helps organisations understand what went wrong after accidents, incidents, near misses and other health and safety loss events. It involves recording incidents, investigating their causes, analysing trends, communicating findings and implementing recommendations to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.
For candidates completing Unit K/616/9538, the assessment goes beyond explaining accident reporting procedures. You need to demonstrate how you contribute to the systems used to investigate events, interpret information and support improvements in workplace health and safety.
This guide explains the six learning outcomes, provides a practical construction workplace scenario and identifies examples of documents that may support the assessment criteria.
What Does NVQ Level 6 Health and Safety Unit 7 Cover?
Unit 7 contains six learning outcomes:
Learning Outcome 1: Develop systems for recording and reporting health and safety loss events.
Learning Outcome 2: Implement incident investigation arrangements.
Learning Outcome 3: Analyse loss-event data and maintain statistical records.
Learning Outcome 4: Communicate reactive monitoring findings and recommendations.
Learning Outcome 5: Understand and evaluate reactive monitoring principles, investigation methods and relevant requirements.
Learning Outcome 6: Maintain a professional development portfolio.
The main objective is to demonstrate how information from incidents and other unwanted events can be used to improve the organisation's health and safety arrangements.
Unit 7 Assessment Questions and Criteria
Add Learning Outcome 6 and criterion 6.1 from the qualification specification used by your assessment centre.
The following guidance explains how candidates can approach the requirements and identify suitable workplace evidence.
Learning Outcome 1: Developing Incident Reporting and Recording Systems
Learning Outcome 1 covers assessment criteria 1.1–1.6.
An effective incident reporting system enables an organisation to identify, record and respond to health and safety loss events consistently.
These events may include workplace injuries, dangerous occurrences, near misses, damage to property and certain cases of occupational ill health.
Identifying health and safety loss events — AC 1.1
Candidates should explain how they identify different types of loss events and determine which require reporting or further investigation.
For example, a construction contractor might record injuries, dropped objects, unsafe plant interactions and incidents involving damaged equipment.
A near miss may not have caused harm, but it can reveal weaknesses in existing arrangements and therefore provide valuable information for future prevention.
Developing incident reporting forms — AC 1.2
A suitable reporting form should capture sufficient information to understand the circumstances of an event.
This could include:
Date, time and location.
Nature of the event.
People involved or affected.
Description of what happened.
Immediate actions taken.
Relevant witnesses.
Potential or actual consequences.
Reporting and investigation responsibilities.
The form should be straightforward to complete and proportionate to the type of event being recorded.
Developing reporting procedures — AC 1.3
A reporting procedure should identify who must be informed, how incidents are escalated and which records must be maintained.
For example, employees may be required to notify their supervisor promptly, while more serious incidents must be escalated to senior management and the health and safety team.
The procedure should also explain how reportable events are identified and how applicable statutory reporting obligations are met.
Implementing reporting arrangements — AC 1.4
Developing a procedure does not automatically mean it has been implemented.
Candidates should demonstrate how reporting arrangements were introduced, communicated and incorporated into workplace practices.
Supporting activities might include supervisor training, workforce briefings, revised forms and monitoring of reporting compliance.
Maintaining records — AC 1.5
Incident records should be accurate, securely maintained and accessible to authorised individuals.
The organisation should have suitable arrangements for confidentiality, document control and retention in accordance with applicable requirements.
Regulatory reporting — AC 1.6
In Great Britain, certain work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous occurrences must be reported under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR).
The duty to report generally falls on the legally responsible person, such as an employer, certain self-employed individuals or a person in control of work premises, depending on the circumstances.
A candidate might demonstrate how they helped establish a process for identifying reportable events, assigning reporting responsibilities and maintaining notification records.
Not every incident is reportable under RIDDOR. Decisions should follow the applicable legal criteria and current HSE guidance.
Learning Outcome 2: Investigating Health and Safety Loss Events
Learning Outcome 2 covers assessment criteria 2.1–2.7.
Investigations help organisations understand how and why incidents occurred.
The purpose should be to identify the circumstances and underlying causes, evaluate the effectiveness of existing controls and recommend appropriate improvements.
Deciding which events need investigation — AC 2.1
The level of investigation should be proportionate to the actual and potential consequences of an event.
For example, a near miss involving a suspended load falling into an unoccupied work area may warrant substantial investigation because of its potential to cause serious injury.
Candidates should explain how the organisation identifies incidents requiring formal investigation and how decisions are recorded.
Planning investigations — AC 2.2
Investigation planning may include identifying competent investigators, establishing responsibilities and determining what resources are required.
Depending on the event, relevant information might include photographs, witness accounts, equipment records, training records and risk assessments.
Implementing investigation procedures — AC 2.3
Candidates should demonstrate how investigation arrangements were introduced or used within their organisation.
This may involve communicating procedures, arranging training, allocating responsibilities and confirming access to appropriate records.
Investigating incidents — AC 2.4
A thorough investigation examines what happened, the immediate causes and the underlying organisational factors.
For example, a worker may trip over a trailing cable, but an effective investigation should consider why the cable was present, whether housekeeping arrangements were adequate and whether supervision or planning contributed to the situation.
The investigation should not stop at identifying an individual's mistake.
Informing relevant stakeholders — AC 2.5
Investigation findings may identify risk assessments that require review or possible breaches of legal duties.
Candidates should demonstrate how relevant management personnel, technical specialists and employee representatives were informed where appropriate.
Communication should be accurate and directed to those responsible for considering or implementing necessary actions.
Implementing recommendations — AC 2.6
Recommendations should be translated into clear actions with responsible persons, appropriate timescales and arrangements for checking completion.
For example, an investigation into a vehicle-related near miss might result in changes to traffic routes, physical segregation and supervision arrangements.
The candidate should demonstrate how implementation was monitored and whether the changes addressed the identified risks.
Maintaining investigation records — AC 2.7
Investigation records may include witness accounts, factual findings, photographs, contributing-factor analyses, recommendations and corrective-action records.
Sensitive information should be handled appropriately, with access restricted where necessary.
Practical Workplace Example: Investigating a Lifting-Operations Near Miss
Consider a fictional construction site where a lifting operation is being carried out using a mobile crane.
During the movement of a load, an unsecured component becomes detached and falls within the designated lifting area. Nobody is injured, but the incident has the potential to cause serious harm.
The Health and Safety Manager is notified and arranges for the lifting operation to be stopped while the immediate risks are controlled.
The manager begins an investigation by reviewing the lift plan, relevant risk assessment, equipment inspection records and competence documentation.
They also speak to the lifting supervisor, slinger/signaller and other personnel involved in the operation.
The investigation establishes that the method used to secure the component was inadequate and that the pre-lift checks had not identified the problem.
Rather than attributing the incident solely to operator error, the manager reviews the planning arrangements, supervision and communication between personnel.
The findings are discussed with project management and the appointed lifting personnel.
Recommendations include reviewing the lifting plan, improving load-security checks and providing additional briefings on identifying unsuitable load arrangements.
An action plan is established with responsibilities and completion dates.
Before the lifting operation resumes, the revised arrangements are reviewed by the responsible competent personnel.
Follow-up checks are then used to confirm that the improvements are being applied.
This fictional scenario illustrates how one incident can generate evidence relating to investigation planning, root-cause analysis, communication and corrective-action monitoring.
An actual NVQ candidate must describe genuine activities they personally carried out and provide authentic supporting evidence.
Learning Outcome 3: Statistical and Epidemiological Analysis
Learning Outcome 3 covers criteria 3.1 and 3.2.
Reactive monitoring is not limited to investigating individual incidents. Organisations also need to examine their incident records collectively to identify patterns.
Producing statistical analyses — AC 3.1
Candidates should demonstrate how they organise and analyse incident information.
Possible categories include:
Number and type of incidents.
Injury severity.
Body parts affected.
Work activities involved.
Locations or departments.
Repeated contributing factors.
Occupational illness patterns.
Trends over reporting periods.
Data may be presented using tables, bar charts, line graphs or other suitable visual methods.
For example, a review might reveal that manual-handling incidents have increased over several reporting periods.
The candidate should consider whether changes in workforce size, hours worked or reporting behaviour influence how those figures should be interpreted.
Where suitable exposure data are available, rates may provide a more meaningful comparison than incident counts alone.
Interpreting incident trends
Statistical analysis should support decision-making rather than simply produce charts.
For example, if a particular work activity is associated with repeated incidents, further investigation may be necessary to understand the causes.
Small datasets require caution because isolated events can create large percentage changes.
Epidemiological analysis may also be relevant when investigating patterns of work-related ill health, taking account of exposure, population characteristics and other factors.
Maintaining analysis records — AC 3.2
Candidates should demonstrate how analyses are stored, updated and made available to authorised personnel.
Examples include monthly incident summaries, retained dashboards, trend analysis reports and management review records.
Learning Outcome 4: Communicating Reactive Monitoring Outcomes
Learning Outcome 4 covers assessment criteria 4.1–4.5.
Investigation findings only contribute to prevention when relevant people understand the conclusions and take appropriate action.
Informing stakeholders — AC 4.1
Different stakeholders may require different levels of detail.
Senior management may need information about systemic weaknesses, legal exposure and resource requirements.
Supervisors may require specific instructions about operational changes.
Employees may need practical explanations of what happened and how similar events can be prevented.
Preparing written and verbal reports — AC 4.2
Reports should distinguish factual findings, analysis, conclusions and recommendations.
They should be accurate, clearly structured and appropriate for the intended audience.
Communicating to non-specialists — AC 4.3
Complex investigation findings should be explained in accessible language.
For example, a workforce briefing may focus on the unsafe conditions identified, changes to working arrangements and the actions employees must follow.
Technical terminology should be explained where necessary.
Selecting recommendations — AC 4.4
Recommendations should address the causes identified by the investigation.
For instance, providing refresher training may be appropriate in some circumstances, but it may be insufficient if the incident arose from poorly designed equipment or an inadequate system of work.
Candidates should explain why particular recommendations were selected and how their effectiveness will be checked.
Meeting regulatory requirements — AC 4.5
Candidates should understand their organisation's arrangements for meeting applicable reporting and regulatory obligations.
This includes identifying reportable events, ensuring that appropriate people are notified and maintaining required records.
For current Great Britain reporting guidance, refer to the Health and Safety Executive's RIDDOR resources.
Learning Outcome 5: Understanding Reactive Monitoring Principles
Learning Outcome 5 covers criteria 5.1–5.6 and focuses on the knowledge underpinning investigation and monitoring systems.
Evaluating reactive monitoring — AC 5.1
Reactive monitoring helps organisations identify failures, recognise patterns and improve their management systems.
However, it has limitations because it relies on information from events that have already occurred.
A low recorded accident rate does not necessarily prove that risks are adequately controlled, particularly where near misses are underreported.
Reactive monitoring should therefore complement proactive monitoring.
Analysing loss events — AC 5.2
Candidates need to consider different event types, causes, consequences and implications for organisational arrangements.
For example, repeated slips and trips may indicate weaknesses in housekeeping, supervision, maintenance or the planning of activities.
A critical analysis should consider underlying organisational factors and not simply list immediate causes.
Explaining reporting procedures — AC 5.3
Candidates should explain how incidents are reported, recorded, escalated and investigated within their organisation.
They should also consider communication channels, responsibilities, timescales and record management.
Investigation and statistical methods — AC 5.4
This criterion includes several analytical and communication principles.
Fault-tree analysis examines combinations of events or failures that could lead to an unwanted outcome.
Events and causal factors analysis examines the sequence of events and the contributing conditions associated with an incident.
Written and verbal communication helps ensure findings and recommendations are understood by relevant audiences.
Responding to the needs of others may involve adapting how information is communicated to witnesses, injured persons, workers and managers.
Statistical and epidemiological analysis involves interpreting patterns in incident and health data, including understanding where probability distributions may be relevant.
Histograms, pie charts, cumulative-sum charts and line graphs can help present different aspects of monitoring data.
Candidates should understand the purpose and limitations of these methods. They should not claim to have applied a technique they have never used.
External influences — AC 5.5
External factors may include legislation, regulatory guidance, industry standards, technological developments and professional guidance on incident investigation.
Candidates should explain how these influences affect organisational procedures.
Statutory and common law requirements — AC 5.6
Candidates should distinguish statutory duties established through legislation from relevant common law principles.
They should understand how legal requirements influence incident reporting, investigations, record keeping and organisational responsibilities.
Complex legal matters should be referred to appropriately qualified professionals where necessary.
Learning Outcome 6: Maintaining Professional Development
The ProQual Unit 7 specification also includes criterion 6.1, addressing maintenance of a personal development portfolio.
This may include:
Reviewing personal competence.
Reflecting on CPD activities.
Establishing professional development goals.
Demonstrating professional ethics.
Recognising diversity and inclusion.
Participating in professional discussion.
For example, a candidate might reflect on incident-investigation training and explain how it improved their approach to identifying underlying causes.
CPD records should demonstrate relevant learning and reflection rather than simply list certificates.
What Workplace Evidence Could Support Unit 7?
The following documents are illustrative examples, not a prescribed evidence checklist.
E01 – Incident Reporting Procedure
Demonstrates how loss events are identified, reported and recorded.
E02 – Accident or Near-Miss Reporting Form
Shows the information captured during initial reporting.
E03 – Incident Register
Records reported events and relevant follow-up information.
E04 – Investigation Procedure
Explains how incidents are selected for investigation and how investigations are conducted.
E05 – Incident Investigation Report
Provides evidence of investigation activities, findings and recommendations.
E06 – Witness Interview Record
Supports the investigation process where interviews were legitimately conducted.
E07 – Risk Assessment Review
Shows how incident findings influenced a review of workplace controls.
E08 – Corrective Action Tracker
Demonstrates how recommendations were allocated, monitored and closed.
E09 – Incident Trend Analysis
Provides numerical and graphical analysis of recorded events.
E10 – Management Reporting or Safety Briefing Record
Shows how monitoring findings were communicated to relevant personnel.
E11 – Regulatory Reporting Record
May demonstrate compliance with applicable statutory reporting obligations where a reportable event actually occurred.
E12 – CPD Record
Supports the professional development requirements of Learning Outcome 6.
Candidates should use only genuine evidence from activities they performed or appropriately contributed to.
Common Mistakes in Unit 7 Assessments
Describing incidents without investigating their causes
An accident report may explain what happened but fail to examine underlying causes.
Candidates should demonstrate the reasoning behind investigation findings and recommendations.
Confusing incident reporting with statutory notification
Not every incident recorded internally requires reporting to the regulator.
Organisations must apply the relevant statutory reporting criteria.
Providing statistics without meaningful interpretation
A graph showing accident numbers is not enough where the criterion requires analysis.
Explain what the information suggests, whether the trend is reliable and how it influences management decisions.
Recommending training for every problem
Training may be useful, but it should not automatically be the only corrective action.
Investigations should consider design, equipment, procedures, supervision and other organisational factors.
Failing to demonstrate corrective-action implementation
Recommendations alone do not demonstrate that improvements have been implemented.
Provide relevant follow-up evidence where the criterion requires action.
Overlooking professional development
Learning Outcome 6 should be included when preparing the complete Unit 7 portfolio.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is NVQ Level 6 Health and Safety Unit 7?
Unit K/616/9538 covers reactive monitoring, including incident reporting, investigations, statistical analysis, communication of findings and professional development.
What is the difference between proactive and reactive monitoring?
Proactive monitoring checks workplace arrangements before unwanted events occur. Reactive monitoring examines incidents and other loss events to identify lessons and necessary improvements.
Is an incident investigation report suitable NVQ evidence?
Yes, where it genuinely demonstrates relevant assessment criteria and the candidate's own involvement.
Must every workplace accident be reported under RIDDOR?
No. Statutory reporting depends on the circumstances and applicable RIDDOR criteria.
Can near-miss investigations be used as evidence?
Yes, where they demonstrate relevant activities such as investigation, analysis, communication or implementation of recommendations.
Do I need to use statistical charts for Unit 7?
The unit specifically includes requirements for statistical and epidemiological analysis and understanding relevant graphical methods. Follow the criteria and your assessor's guidance on the evidence needed.
Is witness testimony compulsory for Unit 7?
Witness testimony may be appropriate for some activities, but the assessor determines the suitable combination of evidence methods.
NVQ Level 6 Health and Safety Unit 7 Answers and Examples
Understanding reactive monitoring assessment criteria can be easier when studying examples showing how incidents, investigations, professional decisions and workplace documents are connected.
Our NVQ Level 6 Health and Safety answers and portfolio examples provide learning resources covering all ten units, including reflective accounts, knowledge-based examples and workplace evidence guidance.
These materials are for study and reference. Candidates must demonstrate their own occupational competence through authentic workplace activities and assessment submissions.
Final Thoughts
Unit 7 of the NVQ Level 6 Occupational Health and Safety Diploma focuses on developing reactive monitoring arrangements that help organisations learn from incidents and improve safety performance.
Candidates should demonstrate how events are reported, investigated and analysed, how findings are communicated and how recommendations lead to practical improvements.
A strong submission connects genuine workplace activities to the relevant assessment criteria and provides clear, authentic supporting evidence.
Unit 7_Element 1.1
Identify health and safety loss events
• Tell your assessor the types of health and safety accidents and incidents that occur
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 1.2
Devise health and safety loss event reporting forms
• Tell your assessor how you were involved in the development or review of your organisations reporting form for accidents and incidents.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 1.3
Develop the health and safety loss event reporting and recording procedure
• Tell your assessor how you were involved in the development or review of your organisations reporting procedure for accidents and incidents.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 1.4
Plan the implementation of the health and safety loss event reporting and recording procedure
• Tell your assessor how you planned to implement the reporting forms and procedures and who did you involve in the planning stages
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 1.5
Maintain records of the health and safety loss event
• Tell your assessor the types of documents you use and keep regarding accidents/incidents.
• Include the information on how they are stored and how they are maintained?
• Who has access to them and how long are the records kept?
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 1.6
Develop a system to report health and safety loss events to the regulatory authorities
• Tell your assessor how you included within the procedure for accident/incident reporting to the regulatory authorities.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.1
Identify which health and safety loss events require a formal investigation
• Tell your assessor how you have decided which accidents/incidents require a formal investigation and explain why.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.2
Plan the implementation of health and safety loss event investigation systems and procedures
• Tell your assessor how you have decided on the roles and responsibilities of those who will be involved in loss event investigation.
• What resources will you need to undertake an investigation (equipment, records, personnel, and expertise)
• How will employees access them?
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.3
Implement health and safety loss event investigation systems and procedures
• Tell your assessor how you rolled out the accident/incident investigation procedure.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.4
Investigate health and safety loss events
• Tell your assessor in detail a loss event you have investigated.
• Describe the procedures and processes you went through.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.5
Identify directors, senior, line, functional and technical managers, employee representatives and employees in order to:
a) advise them about the risk assessments that need to be reviewed in the light of health and safety loss event investigations
b) advise them of the possible breaches of statutory and common law requirements following health and safety loss event investigations
a) Explain the methods you have used to inform all levels within your organisation of the changes to a risk assessment because of an accident you investigated
b) Explain who you would inform in the organisation of breaches to statutory and common law duties because of an investigation you have completed
You must provide 2 pieces of supporting evidence for each bullet point that has clearly been discussed under the headings
Unit 7_Element 2.6
Manage the implementation of recommendations arising from health and safety loss event investigations
• Tell your assessor how you manage the implementation of recommendations you have made because of an investigation you have completed
• 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 2.7
Keep records of health and safety investigations
Tell your assessor what records of accidents/incidents you keep
• How are they stored?
• How are they maintained?
• Who has access to them and how long are the records kept?
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 3.1
Produce statistical and epidemiological analyses of the health and safety loss event data in the organisation in order to:
a) present it in numerical and graphical format
b) interpret statistical and epidemiological analyses
c) present to directors, senior, line, functional and technical managers, employee representatives and employees in a meaningful way
a) Explain how you develop and present statistics of accidents in both numbers and using graphs
b) Explain how you use this data to identify trends in relation to types, body part affected, ill health etc
c) Explain how you present the data to different groups to ensure they understand the information you are providing
You must provide 2 pieces of supporting evidence for each bullet point that has clearly been discussed under the headings
Unit 7_Element 3.2
Keep records of health and safety loss event statistical and epidemiological analyses.
• Tell your assessor how you keep records regarding statistics you have developed and analysed.
• Explain how you have stored and maintained the statistical data?
• Who has access to them and how long are the records kept?
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 4.1
Inform directors, senior, line, functional and technical managers, employee representatives and employees of the outcomes of health and safety reactive performance monitoring
• Tell your assessor how you ensure all levels of the organisation are informed of the outcomes that have resulted from your accident/incident investigations.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 4.2
Prepare written and verbal reports of the outcomes of health and safety reactive performance monitoring
• Tell your assessor the type of information and data you consider when producing reports on accidents/incidents.
• Explain how the report is formatted and ensure the information is clear and concise.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 4.3
Interpret to a lay audience the outcomes of health and safety reactive performance monitoring
• Describe an occasion when you have communicated the outcomes of accident/incident investigations to an audience who are not Health & Safety professionals
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 4.4
Select appropriate recommendations based on the outcomes of reactive performance monitoring
• Tell your assessor how and why you select recommendations you have made because of the outcomes of an investigation
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 4.5
Comply with the requirements of the regulatory authorities in respect of the outcomes of health and safety reactive performance monitoring
• Tell your assessor how you ensure compliance with the requirements of regulatory authorities within your country in determining what requires formal reporting, by whom and when? (i.e. RIDDOR).
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 5.1
Evaluate the nature and role of reactive health and safety monitoring systems within the organisation
• Tell your assessor the nature of Reactive Health & Safety monitoring in your organisation
• Explain the role of reactive monitoring in your organisation.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 5.2
Critically analyse health and safety loss events that require formal investigation in relation to:
a) types
b) causes
c) impacts
d) Systems and procedures.
Using A, B, C & D as headings in your reflective accounts
a) Explain your analysis for the different types of accidents / incidents that require a formal investigation
b) Explain your analysis the causes of those accidents / incidents that would require a formal investigation
c) Explain your analysis the impact the above will have on your organisation that would require a formal investigation
d) Explain your analysis how the above will affect your systems and procedures that would require a formal investigation
You must provide 2 pieces of supporting evidence for each bullet point that has clearly been discussed under the headings
Unit 7_Element 5.3
Explain reporting and recording procedures for health and safety loss events.
• Tell your assessor the process for reporting and recording incidents.
• Consider the communication methods used, speed, and the personnel requiring notification.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 5.4
Explain principles of:
a) fault-tree analysis
b) events and causal factors analysis
c) effective written and verbal communication
d) how to respond to the needs of others
e) statistical and epidemiological analyses of data, including the use of the normal and Poisson distribution
f) histograms, pie charts, cusum charts and line graphs
Using A, B, C, D, E, F as headings in your reflective accounts
You must provide 2 pieces of supporting evidence for each bullet point that has clearly been discussed under the headings
• Describe to your assessor the principles of each bullet point.
• Consider completing research if you do not use any of the above techniques
Unit 7_Element 5.5
Explain external factors influencing reactive health and safety monitoring systems and investigations
• Tell your assessor what external factors could influence methods of accident/incident investigations systems and procedures.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response
Unit 7_Element 5.6
Explain health and safety statutory and common law requirements regarding loss events.
• Tell your assessor what the differences are between common law and statute law.
• Consider the powers of regulatory authorities and the penalties that can be administered by courts.
• Provide 2 pieces of workplace evidence to support the written response